Back to overview

Towards an effective in-situ biodiversity assessment in European forests

Assessing multi-taxon biodiversity is crucial to understand forests’ response to environmental changes and to inform management strategies. In Europe, forest biodiversity monitoring is still scattered and heterogeneous, although a long-term monitoring network has long been advocated. Given the monitoring aims reported in various EU policies, this network should be accurately designed also through the estimation of its sampling effort, here intended as the number of sampling plots and sites. We used a novel database of forest multi-taxon biodiversity for a pilot study to: estimate the minimum sampling effort needed to: assess variation in species richness and composition; compare these estimates with the efforts invested in the pilot database; discuss estimates’ differences across taxonomic groups and forest categories. We focused on six taxonomic groups (vascular plants, birds, epiphytic lichens and bryophytes, wood-inhabiting fungi and saproxylic beetles) across six forest categories. Based on 6,165 plots at 2,084 different locations across Europe, we benchmarked the effort to achieve: a complete species richness estimate through interpolation/extrapolation curves, and a precise evaluation of species composition variation through multivariate standard error. Our estimates differed widely, especially among taxonomic groups. For species richness, estimates range from 3 to 147 plots per site across 3 to 29 sites per forest category, with birds and epiphytic bryophytes requiring the least effort. For species composition, estimates range from 5 to over 25 plots per site across 5 to 20 sites per forest category, with saproxylic beetles, vascular plants, and fungi displaying the highest estimates. The taxonomic groups requiring an effort comparable to existing data were the least diverse, all the others need greater efforts, either for species richness (e.g., saproxylic beetles), or species composition (e.g., vascular plants), or both (e.g., wood-inhabiting fungi). An effective monitoring network of European forests’ biodiversity should thoroughly account for these benchmarks and for their taxon-dependency.

Details

Number of pages 12
Volume 84
Pages (to-from) 121-132
Type A1: Web of Science-article
Category Research
Magazine Basic and Applied Ecology
Issns 1439-1791
Publisher Urban & Fischer
Language English
Bibtex

@misc{acbec5bb-1c3f-46b0-a71b-b4092de1cf7c,
title = "Towards an effective in-situ biodiversity assessment in European forests",
abstract = "Assessing multi-taxon biodiversity is crucial to understand forests’ response to environmental changes and to inform management strategies. In Europe, forest biodiversity monitoring is still scattered and heterogeneous, although a long-term monitoring network has long been advocated. Given the monitoring aims reported in various EU policies, this network should be accurately designed also through the estimation of its sampling effort, here intended as the number of sampling plots and sites. We used a novel database of forest multi-taxon biodiversity for a pilot study to: estimate the minimum sampling effort needed to: assess variation in species richness and composition; compare these estimates with the efforts invested in the pilot database; discuss estimates’ differences across taxonomic groups and forest categories. We focused on six taxonomic groups (vascular plants, birds, epiphytic lichens and bryophytes, wood-inhabiting fungi and saproxylic beetles) across six forest categories. Based on 6,165 plots at 2,084 different locations across Europe, we benchmarked the effort to achieve: a complete species richness estimate through interpolation/extrapolation curves, and a precise evaluation of species composition variation through multivariate standard error. Our estimates differed widely, especially among taxonomic groups. For species richness, estimates range from 3 to 147 plots per site across 3 to 29 sites per forest category, with birds and epiphytic bryophytes requiring the least effort. For species composition, estimates range from 5 to over 25 plots per site across 5 to 20 sites per forest category, with saproxylic beetles, vascular plants, and fungi displaying the highest estimates. The taxonomic groups requiring an effort comparable to existing data were the least diverse, all the others need greater efforts, either for species richness (e.g., saproxylic beetles), or species composition (e.g., vascular plants), or both (e.g., wood-inhabiting fungi). An effective monitoring network of European forests’ biodiversity should thoroughly account for these benchmarks and for their taxon-dependency.",
author = "Sabina Burrascano and Lucas Chojnacki and Lorenzo Balducci and Francesco Chianucci and Elena Haeler and Sebastian Kepfer Rojas and Yoan Paillet and Rafael Barreto de Andrade and Steffen Boch and Pallieter De Smedt and Markus Fischer and Itziar Garcia Mijangos and Jacob Heilmann-Clausen and Jeňýk Hofmeister and Jan Hošek and Daniel Kozák and Gergely Kutszegi and thibault Lachat and Martin Mikoláš and Ferenc Samu and Sonia Ravera and Peter Schall and Tommaso Sitzia and Miroslav Svoboda and Giovanni Trentanovi and Mariana Ujhazyova and Kris Vandekerkhove and Flóra Tinya and Peter Odor",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "05",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2025.03.003",
language = "English",
publisher = "Urban & Fischer",
address = "Belgium,
type = "Other"
}

Authors

Sabina Burrascano
Lucas Chojnacki
Lorenzo Balducci
Francesco Chianucci
Elena Haeler
Sebastian Kepfer Rojas
Yoan Paillet
Rafael Barreto de Andrade
Steffen Boch
Pallieter De Smedt
Markus Fischer
Itziar Garcia Mijangos
Jacob Heilmann-Clausen
Jeňýk Hofmeister
Jan Hošek
Daniel Kozák
Gergely Kutszegi
thibault Lachat
Martin Mikoláš
Ferenc Samu
Sonia Ravera
Peter Schall
Tommaso Sitzia
Miroslav Svoboda
Giovanni Trentanovi
Mariana Ujhazyova
Kris Vandekerkhove
Flóra Tinya
Peter Odor